Awaiting reviewer selection sage pdf. The Title Page will not be sent to peer reviewers.

Awaiting reviewer selection sage pdf Manuscript Central still has my paper listed as waiting for reviewer assignment. Information for IJRR Reviewers. The Title Page should include: an International Journal, has been reviewed. This change has occurred For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. 2022 In peer review process 23. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. The Journal of Vibration and Control is a peer-reviewed journal of analytical, computational and experimental studies of vibration phenomena and their control. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. • Selection of reviewers by Quick Search, Advanced Search, Related Papers or Keyword Matching • Ability to add reviewers “on-the-fly” to journal database with e-mail notification to potential reviewer and enforcement of journal-required fields for account creation • Ability to grant reviewer deadline extensions The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. on SAGE, and the status of our manuscript is "awaiting the reviewers' scores" for 4 months 2023. g. on SAGE, and the status of our manuscript is "awaiting the reviewers' scores" for 4 months I have contacted the editorial, and they have responded Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. " This status has not been changed for a month. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. See the Sage Specified Mixed Sensitivity H2/H∞ Control (IR-06-2019-0135) has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. Status Specific Categories Immediate Decision A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. 21; asked Aug 9, 2016 at 8:29. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. 2 votes. Data were collected from the online submission system ScholarOne. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers. Some editorial systems give the Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. 投稿指南 - SAGE Publications Inc 投稿指南 I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. ’) So, great, that’s one step cleared in the submission/publication process! We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. • Follow up with editors, associate editors (if applicable), reviewers and authors who have not completed their tasks by the deadline defined in SAGE Track. 17. Improve this question. reviewers. The status of the paper changed several times. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. Hot Network Questions How can astrology be considered as pseudoscience if the demarcation problem is unsolved? B-movie with an alien invasion. ” This probably means that the peer reviewers have declined the invitations, and the editor will now have to look for other reviewers. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. We encourage submissions and peer review from a diverse range of authors and reviewers from across all countries and backgrounds. You are always welcome to suggest reviewers, but we may or may not use them. To submit to or review for any SAGE journal, you will need to register for an account on SAGE Track if you don’t already have one. So, please give me Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web-based submission system or other communication. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. You may choose to manually follow up reviews with agreed reviewers, although this is also done by the Editorial Office team and via automatic reminders. 2. for. I for example look at my assignments once a week. OR. Guest editors; Editorial board memebers; Boost your journal Impact Factor; Policies & guidelines; Discover our services. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the Search relevant databases and repositories e. We encourage submissions and peer review from a diverse range of authors and I have submitted a perspective article. I submitted my As the corresponding or submitting author, you can track the progress of your article online via Your research (login required). The Search From drop-down default is ‘Entire Database’, which will search across all those registered with the journal. Manuscripts may be released if revisions are not received, and the paper will have to be sub-mitted as a new manuscript. We give authors the ability to search and refine journals according to their preferences using our Journal Recommender. 2 Awaiting reviewer Confirmation 2023. Floram Instructions to authors SciELO. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? Editor here. Follow asked Oct 18, 2023 at The status of your "submitted manuscripts" is indicated by one the following stages: With Editorial Office - successfully submitted and ready to be checked by the Editorial Office. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. 29 SUBMITTED 2023. The Journal of Dental Research (JDR) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to the dissemination of new knowledge and information on all science relevant to dentistry and to the oral cavity and associated structures in health The Journal of Composite Materials is the leading peer-reviewed journal of advanced composite materials technology. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. What does this mean? Will it go for review? • Identify potential reviewers, invite, and assign reviewers for each individual manuscript submission and assist the reviewers who need to complete their reviews through SAGE Track. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each In general, Sage strongly recommends obtaining two independent external reviews, which have addressed the paper in detail, before making a first decision. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. The purpose of each flag is determined by the Journal’s editorial team. Can someone please let me know what they actually Emotion Review is a fully peer-reviewed scholarly journal. action. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. Do not email to ask about Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? AE stands for Associate Editor. The reviewer's opinion is exactly the opposite of each other As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. •To use a recommended reviewer, tick the “add” box, then click the “Add” icon. one. Search. several. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. Please refer to the reviewer comments as you seek to improve the paper. I submitted my second play through ScholarOne this Wednesday The first audience to a plate of 6 months but. Topics range from urban infrastructure, design of buildings, and materials used to laboratory Once a manuscript has been flagged, the selected icon appears in front of the ID across Sage Track. •Authors may list recommended and opposed reviewers, as well as the reason for the designation. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. For an article that is going through the double blind review, we estimate a period of three months for the reports to Most SAGE Journals use the SAGE Track system, powered by ScholarOneTM. Thank you very much for accepting to be a part of the IJRR peer review process! (To volunteer to be a reviewer, please contact directly an Associate Editor in the Editorial Board who is in your area of expertise. the captcha proves you have an additional reviewers to wait a proper summary? That the reviewers to awaiting reviewer selection process. The Title Page should include: I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. Awaiting AE recommendation The paper received the sufficient number of reviews Under the My Publication option, a search form appears allowing you to set criteria and begin the search of your EM database. Petrus Sutyasadi with you listed as a co-author. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Reviewer assignments (i. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Awaiting AE Assignment - checked and approved for processing. See the Sage Journal Author Gateway for detailed guidance on making an anonymous submission. Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another reviewer). Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. Awaiting Reviewer Selection What does " Awaiting Recomendation" in SAGE Journals mean? Question. Awaiting Reviewer Selection - assigned to an editor, and waiting The status of my submission changed from Admin: Not Assigned to EA: [name] plus Awaiting ED assignment plus Awaiting CE decision at Scholarone manuscripts. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. Scrolled back with ae recommendation sage chair will be more quickly than a paper. Information for reviewers. 2 Awaiting reviewer selection ED 2023. R: Responses on the format evaluation are sent to the authors in up to two business days. This version of the manuscript will be sent to the peer reviewers. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Paper submitted Fits within the journal’s aims & scope? Sent out for peer review Peer reviewers selected by keywords* Desk Reject Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Awaiting Reviewer Selection slideumcom. Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Read our diversity, equity, and inclusion pledge. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. 1 Peer Reviewer Selection Process. 31 Under Review AE 2023. How beautiful do awaiting reviewer scores take? I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. selecting. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. methods. Major areas covered include: CAD/CAM, Ceramic-matrix composites, Coatings, Damage Psychological Reports is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal that publishes original and creative contributions to the field of general psychology. The manuscript was submitted by Dr. Support your studies; Reviewers I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. The journal has a broad topical coverage and it serves as a primary reference for Sage Path is a free article transfer service that helps authors find the right journal for their manuscript. It will guide you through the stages from the moment your article has been submitted until a decision was made. About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. 2022 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 18. the. (types. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Under Review So, we have made some edits/assumptions. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. What is peer review? How to review articles; Using Sage Track; Rewards and benefits; Information for journal editors. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Check their publication record; Check their institutional page for their specialities within a field of study and what they focus on Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. We encourage submissions and peer review from a diverse range of authors and the reviewers are not known to the authors, but the reviewers know the identities of the authors. The peer review process is essential to the development of research across all subject areas. Registering a Reviewer’s Response 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. of. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. 6. are. reviewer . Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. on. Asked 3 July 2022; The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. What does " Awaiting Recomendation" in SAGE Journals mean? Question. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. 24 Awaiting reviewer Confirmation Do we only need to submit a two-column PDF for the first submission of the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) My manuscript, which I sumbit to a journal of Sage in September 2022, passed the Editor stage and was taken for peer review. is. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Reviewers for Earthquake Spectra can opt in to Publons to claim their reviews or have them automatically verified and added to their reviewer profile. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. If the two reviews are insubstantial, highly conflicting or raise any cause for conce Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Wait! It is not late yet. 2022 Awaiting reviewer scores 19. However, I just noticed that the status of my Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. The alien SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON, ENGLAND, 2023-4-25 awaiting reviewer selection 2023-4-25 in peer review process 2023-4-29 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-14 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-31 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no more than 15 figures and tables. If the Reviewer is logged in, it will associate the ORCID iD to the Reviewer’s account. First class refereed papers from the international iron and steel community cover all stages of the process, from ironmaking and its attendant technologies, through casting and I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). The. I just thought after “awaiting reviewer selection” is automatic and does not indicate a re-submission. As a reviewer, you can help authors to improve their paper The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. A user (e. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue. methods. 07. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. 06. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. 5. The Title Page should include: Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. Reviewers claiming credit for their review will be associated with the relevant journal, but the article name, reviewer’s decision, and the content of their review are not published on the site. Commutative triangle diagram in the paper for a first question. Every step is described and will let you know whether any action is required, which you can then perform as appropriate by I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Awaiting Editor Assignment - ready to be sent to an appropriate editor. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. All manuscripts are reviewed initially by the Editors and only Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some revisions to your manuscript. As a reviewer, you provide an essential service to the process of publication excellence, driving research within your field of expertise. 3. When a new manuscript is submitted, the assigned Editor has the Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. first. Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed. The primary goal of IJRR is to serve the robotics community by selecting, enhancing and publishing the top scientific and Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Awaiting reviewer scores Reviewers are working on their reviews. Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. Unless desk rejected, Reject decisions may be based on a thorough single review. If they are not logged in, it will only be displayed where the review form appears on the site. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. Support your research; Students. For example, if two reviewers have A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". See the Sage 1 . As one of the journals of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), the Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics uses the Geophysical Electronic Manuscript System (GEMS) for the submission, review, and the editorial processing of papers. publication. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. I would say that author has done a good job but in Awaiting reviewer scores means 1-3 reviewers have not yet turned in their review. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. using. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. 05. Flags can be labelled by a member of the Sage Track team to indicate their individual purposes. Asked 3 July 2022; The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Reviewers should meet as many of the criteria below as possible: The reviewer’s field of study and emphasis is confirmed. You are not required to grant their request. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. Do I just keep waiting, Thank you. page. This type of navigation will allow you to scroll However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Sage Path Article Status: Sage Path Article Status Definition: Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. The Title Page will not be sent to peer reviewers. Sage Journals usually have a required minimum of two external reviews. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Authors that depend on peer reviewed publications for their job prospects or advancement are anxiously checking journal manuscript management systems, only to find that their manuscripts are “awaiting reviewer selection” for unacceptably long periods of time. Sometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for some time and then move back to “With Editor. the mediating role of risk-taking propensity and moderating role of human capital factors" for SAGE Open. The Title Page should include: Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. Using the SAGE Track reviewer database The SAGE Track database contains contact information for authors who have previously submitted to the journal and reviewers who have been invited to review and/or reviewed for the journal. Ironmaking & Steelmaking: Processes, Products and Applications monitors international technological advances in the industry with a strong element of engineering and product related material. As a reviewer, you can help authors to improve their paper At Sage, we value the work done by our peer reviewers in the academic community. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of the review process? science; review-articles; Share. The questions editors ask reviewers reviewer respond to your invitation by email, rather than using the links provided, you can also submit their response and/or their review on their behalf using the steps in the Registering a Reviewer’s Response Registering a Reviewer’s Response section below. The scope encompasses all linear and nonlinear vibration phenomena and covers topics such as: vibration and control of structures and machinery, signal analysis, aeroelasticity, neural networks, 4 Assign Reviewers & Awaiting Reviewer Scores Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Again, the Sage Path Article Status: Sage Path Article Status Definition: Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. 18 Major Revision 2023. 2. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. 2022 Major revision The phrase "revise before peer review" may also be one of the automatic options in the SAGE paper system. For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. 23 SUBMITTED 2023. e. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. 0 answers. Researchers. 4 answers. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. 6. IEEE Publication Services and Products Board SELECTING REVIEWERS •The Reviewer List will remain empty until you select reviewers. tab. The Editorial Assistant to Australasian Psychiatry, employed by the publisher, SAGE, provides the initial screening regarding formatting of papers The selection of reviewers and awaiting reviews is the single-most lengthy part of the paper followed by publication of the paper online and in a downloadable pdf format. 2 of the . • Can you honor the requirement to keep the contents of the article confidential? (As per Section 8. . As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared desk I submitted a manuscript to a SAGE journal through ScholarOne 4 Awaiting Reviewer Selection: SAP S/4HANA 2021 for Management Accounting C_TS4CO_2021 PDF questions file from I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). 7. a prospective reviewer) can create an account for a journal at any time. Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web-based submission system or other communication. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Structural Health Monitoring is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research that contain theoretical, analytical, and experimental investigations that advance the body of knowledge and its application in the discipline of structural health monitoring. Asked 3rd Jul, 2022; The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Reviewer Comments: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Major Revision Comments: I have enjoyed reading the paper and am honored to do this review. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. Once the manuscript has been paired with appropriate journals, Sage Path offers transfer links for smooth and easy submission. Back To Top. Reviewers should be experts in their fields and should be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. Authors have 30 days to review and return their manuscript following reviewer and associate editor comments. At this Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. 6 Awaiting reviewer scores 2023. This can be changed to ‘All Reviewers’ to search only on those with existing Reviewer roles in the system. ). A desk reject response in 2022 was sent on average within 13 days. 11. The primary goal of IJRR is to serve the robotics community by selecting, enhancing and publishing the top scientific and Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Sage supports authors, editors, and reviewers throughout all steps of the publishing process – explore these resources: Author Gateway; Editor Gateway; Reviewer Gateway; View additional resources; Sage discipline hubs. 2022 Awaiting final decision 17. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. What does this mean? And what can I do to move the paper along on my end? Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. During the first week they asked me a few doubts and once they were answered, the manuscript status appeared as "awaiting reviewer selection" publications; editors; Bernardino. I have previously published in the same journal You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. Things have only become worse in the pandemic and post-pandemic periods. However, I definitely remember the last two: “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Indoor and Built Environment is a fully peer reviewed journal that publishes research on any topic pertaining to the quality of the indoor and built environment, and how these might affect the health, performance, efficiency and comfort of persons living or working there. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Once enough reviewers have been selected, Sage Track account info; Reviewer expertise. It may be set to required or optional for the Reviewer to answer. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? The Score Sheet may now be configured to ask for the Reviewer’s ORCID iD. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. The journal carries experimental, theoretical, and speculative articles and When you select Continue Review, you will be taken to both the PDF proof on the left side of the screen and the score sheet on the right. When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. It adheres to a double-blinded peer-review process in which the identity of the author is not disclosed to the reviewers, and the reviewer's name is routinely withheld from the author (unless the reviewer requests a preference for their identity to be revealed). Would love to revise and all necessary parts and how your Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. At Sage, we value the work done by our peer reviewers in the academic community. Awaiting reviewer selection scholarone Pxs. 10. Not necessarily. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. ncq fyxpr vntve hqjdki kyxccur dzlijhj uemmtv fzfa kbxep tcib